Under what conditions would a corporate victim of computer crime pursue their attackers to the full extent of their abilities and what is the downside to such action.

In today's modern-day organisations, pc security is aprocess that requirements constant vigilance. Organisations are heavily invested insecurity technologies. Unfortunately, too many organisations sit back and relaxonce they have added the newest application and hardware for access controls,encryption, anti-virus, and firewalls (Flynn & Kahn, p. 153). Security is critical for anysystem but becomes increasingly crucial as the net spreads in scopegeographically and across areas of our life (Aron & Sampler p. 69).

One on the most well-known computer crimes made againstcorporations and corporations is the theft of trade secrets (BBCNews). In accordance with the by report byBBCNews, practically all businesses had been attacked in 1 way or theother. These attacks are from the form of personal computer viruses, website defacements,denial of service attack, and theft of propriety information. It is oftencalled cyber vandalism (Sneider and Perry, p. 161).

In recent years, there have been a large variety ofattacks on sites by hackers who are angry of the owner from the website.Though it's not regarded as being serious adequate to merit serious attention,these kinds of attacks are on the other hand dangerous on the credibility ofcorporate ICT infrastructures to handle security breaches and preserve theconfidentiality of their clients' information. Damages have largely beencounted economical terms rather than on social or emotional aspects.

Conditions:

Corporate victims of corporate computer attacks canresort to all legal remedies offered particularly pertaining to provisions andguidelines of their country's e-commerce law. A student in NortheasternUniversity in Boston was charged with with a hijacked corporate Internetaccount to attack NASA and Department of Defense computers and damage serversof an ISP. The defendant was able to obtain illegal entry to several computerseither causing substantial business loss. Following a careful investigation andmeticulous examination with the hacker's trail, the attacker, who was eventuallycaught, was recognized as Ikenna Iffih. If convicted, he could face a maximumof 10 years in jail along with a fine of $250,000 (O'Brien, p. 483).

Telia is an example of the company which pursued theirattackers to the full extent of their abilities but inside a much more radical way.According to the electronic magazine Z Central, Telia made some kind ofsurveillance through a world wide web surveillance unit to spy on hackers andwould-be-hackers (Arnrup, n.d).The mission from the unit was to gather information about subscribers suspectedto be hackers and eventually prosecute people responsible.

It is often easy to rely on these laws for ourprotection. However, as technology evolves, so does the sophistication andcomplexities of personal computer attacks. Our laws are not able to adjust quicklyenough to meet these kinds of situations. Corporate victims may perhaps eventually endup on a losing side due to they have to use more and far more of theirresources and expertise to be able to get justice.

In this sort of instances, corporate victims can pursue theirattackers on the full extent of their abilities if you will discover major damages totheir economic and political survival. Ideally, they shouldn't allow these kindsof attacks go unpunished since it would only embolden their attackers in thefuture. However, if organisations are usually under threat from thesepeople, then it's time to try and do some action and make them pay. Other victims maynot be interested in extra pursuing their attackers simply because they think thatdoing so would only take up their resources, time, and efforts. Some just try tocharge it to experience and move on.

Downside

It is usually hard toenforce e-commerce laws and other laws related to cybercrime due to thenature on the Internet. It is easy to use personal computer networks and the Internet tocommit fraud and crime due to the fact the web is borderless and most of its usershide under a cloak of anonymity. Sometimes, pursuing your attackers entailscrossing into different geo-political and judicial systems of differentcountries which have different e-commerce laws.

According to Daniel Arnrup, the system done by Teliais illegal under particular conditions. These acts definitely encourage totalitarian social control of the enterprise. Italso infringes on a freedom and privacy of subscribers.

Efforts to punish people held responsible for thesecrimes have largely been held in abeyance for the age, nature, behavior, andorigin with the attacker. Most of them are among the ages 12 and 25 many years ofage and have modest assets which could satisfy a judgment (Standler, 2002). Sometimes, the law cannotdistinguish that are truly regarded as as cyber crimes and that are not. Thismakes it a lot more difficult for corporate victims to seek redress and ask fordamages.

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.