Source: A personal letter from president Eisenhower to Military Captain, E. E. Swede Hazlett, October 23, 1954 from The Dwight D. Eisenhower Library, National Archives of America.
Source: The National Archives of America, Website, http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/brown-v-board/, accessed on 18th June 2012
in spite of two unanimous decisions and careful, if not vague, wording, there was considerable rampart to the Supreme Courts ruling in Brown v. Board of Education. In addition to the obvious disapproving segregationists were some constitutional scholars who mat that the decision went against legal tradition by relying heavily on data supplied by social scientists rather than precedent or established law. Supporters of legal restraint believed the Court had overstepped its constitutional powers by essentially writing refreshing law.
However, minority groups and members of the civil rights political campaign were buoyed by the Brown decision even without specific directions for implementation.
Proponents of judicial activism believed the Supreme Court had appropriately used its position to adapt the basis of the Constitution to address bran-new problems in new times. The Warren Court stayed this course for the next 15 years, deciding cases that significantly affected not only race relations, moreover also the administration of criminal justice, the operation of the political process, and the insularity of church and state.
Source: Transcript of PBS Newshour Interview, Brown v. Board of Education 50 Years Later, 17th May 2004
GWEN IFILL: lambert years ago, the Supreme Court established a new doctrine in America: Separate could not plastered equal. And although the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka ruling was intend to desegregate public schools, its domino effect changed the complexion of the nations workplaces and...If you regard to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment