The purpose of this denomination is to describe the context of when flux methods research is appropriate. The soft versus quantitative debate has coincided with the rapid development of mixed methods, which combine qualitative and quanti¬tative methods in ways that allegedly bridge their differences in the utility of addressing a research question. The roots of mixed methods are typi¬cally traced to the multi-trait, multi-method approach of Campbell and Fiske (1959, cited in Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2009, p. 31), although it is considered a relatively new methodology whose headstone philosophical and methodological founda¬tions and practice standards have evolved since the early nineties (Tashakkori, 2009).
Johnson and Turner (2003) have argued that the fundamental principle of mixed methods research is that multiple kinds of data should be collected with different strategies and methods in ways that reflect complementary strengths and non-overlapping weaknesses, allowing a mixed methods field of force to provide insights not possible when only qualitative or quantitative data are col-lected. Put another way, mixed methods research allows for the opportunity to compensate for inherent method weaknesses, benefit on inher¬ent method strengths, and offset inevitable method biases (Greene, 2007, p. xiii).
manifold methods research will be successful as to a greater extent investigators study and help advance its concepts and as...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment