Many articles are written by modern psychologists and psychoanalysts that try out the importance of beauty
in human and animal breeding as thoroughly as survival. One such article The Biology of debaucher suggests this importance and
backs it up with many facts and figures as well as surveys on normal people. The article states many theories and hypotheses
and also tries to exempt why beauty plays such an important role in sexuality and power. What is beauty? According to this
article, beauty is a conclave of symmetry, special qualities, and traits.
       Â
                Symmetry is perhaps the most supported sidetrack of beauty in this article. The article states that symmetry
shows teemingness of sexual hormones, wellness, and say-so of the immune system. They support their hypothesis of
symmetrys affect on the abundance of sexual hormones with various scientific evidence. Two psychologists, Steven
Gangestead and Randy Thornhill deliberate the symmetry of hundreds of men and women in college. They also asked them
to complete a personal confidential survey that gave information on their health and sex lives. What they found was that the
men and women with better symmetry had started having sex 3-4 years before the people with average symmetry.
Gangestead and Thornhill also completed other survey involving womens responses to isosceles men and men with
average symmetry. The results were as expected. The women with harmonious partners responded twice as much
compared to the women with men having average symmetry. The rate of contraceptive method was also much higher. Animals are
much more severe in their choosing.
effeminate penguins wont accept males who arent plump and symmetrical, and female
scorpion flies but accept males with symmetrical wings, as they are better at hunting and protecting. Also, little symmetrical
men and women surveyed had more ailments and more frequent accounts of...
I forecast you approached this article well, considering the lose of studis and data on the topic of the convergence of biology and beauty. It was unbiased, and the comprehension of your opinion following the information at the conlcusion works unfeignedly well. The comparisons between human and animals were particularly interesting.
However, I just dont think its possible to have a full discussion about(predicate) this topic and leave out the social/cultural issues. Thats my only criticism.
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment