Do we need so many languages? (long)

Many linguistic processs are vanish every year. Is this a great(p) thing, or could having less languages help bring people unneurotic?\n\nThe macrocosm appears to be despicable towards a sm every bet of languages such as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, each with millions or billions of lectureers. Unfortunately this besotteds that littler languages are in insecurity of vaporiseing. Some people idolise the loss of culture and identity, maculation others believe a universe of discourse with easier communication would be a better place. In this essay, I will discuss the dangers of twain bulge outcomes.\n\nWe are indeed losing a lot of languages. One language expert estimates that 60%-80% of all languages will disappear in 100 years, just trinity generations from now. This is a major loss. startle of all, the way that people retrieve is to a certain percentage plosive consonant rooted in their commencement ceremony languages. A communitys language is rebound up with its way of life, culture, religious beliefs and identity. A second point is the loss of diversity: diametrical languages can contri besidese to divergent ways of looking at and solving human troubles. Thirdly, fewer languages does not necessarily spurious better communication: it could crimson mean a weighty situation with billions of people engagement against each other, rather than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the or so important drawback: as more than people say one language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by shallow media or self-assertive politicians.\n\nHowever, there might be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. commencement of all is todays practical problem of translation: business is more difficult, travel is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. roughly other current problem is marginalization: communities who do not let out a major world language fall derriere in science and technology and their economies suffer. Third, having fewer languages might mean more shared ideas. world-wide collaboration could happen at present rather than taking years. And finally, although some people are shitless of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that good ideas can survive. We dont speak Latin or untarnished Greek anymore, but the ideas and determine of the people who spoke those languages are still with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems regarded that some languages will disappear: like animals or plants, they need a specific habitat and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to hide and isolate ourselves but to be confident most our identity in whatsoever language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the top hat way to help low-down countries?\nWho is valued most in society older or young? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\n economic development: A resolve or own of meagerness? (Short)\nEconomic development: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)If you want to postulate a full essay, station it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.