The Treatments of the Theme of Colonialism in Two Novels

Flory the Englishman, for example, has a friend in the Indian Dr. Veraswami, indicating that he is impulsive to accept such a non-European as his refer---to a certain extent, that is. When the doctor asks Flory to help him fall upon admittance to the European Club in order to be protected from his shabbiness nemesis U Po Kyin. Flory is willing to be the Indian doctor's friend, but when push comes to shove, he is non willing to accept him as an equal if it means put his bear privileged position in jeopardy:

it of all time made him feel uncomfortable when it had to be admitted between them that the doctor, because of his saturnine skin, could not be received in the Club. It is a unappealing thing when one's close friend is not one's social equal; but it is a thing native to the very business of India (Or hygienic 47).

In other words, such colonialistic inequality is an unpleasant but inevitable part of Flory's relationship with Indians, smashing friends or not, and for the most part he accepted it and is not about to do anything about it. Like the birthmark on his face which is a symbol of his moral corruption, he cannot sit away from it and to date must accept it as much as he can, whether he likes it or not. It is true that Flory does finally try to get the doctor into the club, but only because the colonial powers of the club enquire a token Indian as member.

Similarly, Flory has taken a Burmese lover, so one might argue he is not such a racist, active or pass

Still, for all colonialists, it was believed that black Africans needed whiteness Europeans to help them, heal them, guide them, and save them. The result was similarly often a contagion of evil and corruption, such as Kurtz represents. After all, as we have read, Kurtz originally believed Perhaps the " wickedness" he saw at the very end of his tone was that such a desire to help others and do good could turn out to be such an insane and corrosive enterprise.

Orwell, George. Burmese Days. San Diego: Harvest, 1962.

It is also important to note that although Flory's corruption is more(prenominal) subtle and ambiguous, and Kurtz' is more complete and brutal, both are lastly driven mad and completely destroyed by their own willingness to participate in the inhumane system of colonialism.

Palmer, R.R., and Joel Colton. A memoir of the Modern World. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1968.

In any case, what Conrad says about his evil colonialist---"All Europe contributed to the making of Kurtz" (Conrad 45), could just as well be said of Flory or any colonialist. The condemnation by both authors of colonialism is a condemnation of the European attitude of big-chested superiority toward mint of the Third World they do not understand nor desire to understand, aside from the added control over those people which such understanding might bring.

ive, after all. However, he discards the cleaning lady at the drop of a hat when he believes he has the chance to marry a white woman whom he sees as more his intellectual equal.

He began with the argument that we whites, from the topographic point of development we had arrived at, 'must necessarily appear to them [savages] in the nature of unearthly beings. . . . By the simple exercise of our will we can assert a power for good practically unbounded (Conrad 45).

It is heavy that the most utterly corrupt character in Orwell's allegory is an Indian, while the European Kurtz plays that role in Conrad's novel. If we take the cardinal characters together, the overa
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.